pwnshell is a stripped down version of the c99 shell and the likes. The only difference is that it a single JSP file, embedded with jQuery with a xterm like interface.
This is most useful at times when we when have an arbitrary file upload to a web-accessible directory that runs on J2EE. It could allow you to browse around the system with the privileges of the web application system user and execute arbitrary system commands. It can also show and alter session variables and help you dump JNDI entries.
pwnshell is a cross platform shell that runs on any system that supports Java 1.5 upwards. It’s usage is also simple – upload it to a vulnerable web directory, point your browser to the shell and when you get the shell, just pretend that you’re looking at the xterm interface. The best of all, it is open source!
Download the pwnshell here.
Friday, January 7, 2011
pwnshell: A Better JSP Shell!
pwnshell is a stripped down version of the c99 shell and the likes. The only difference is that it a single JSP file, embedded with jQuery with a xterm like interface.
This is most useful at times when we when have an arbitrary file upload to a web-accessible directory that runs on J2EE. It could allow you to browse around the system with the privileges of the web application system user and execute arbitrary system commands. It can also show and alter session variables and help you dump JNDI entries.
pwnshell is a cross platform shell that runs on any system that supports Java 1.5 upwards. It’s usage is also simple – upload it to a vulnerable web directory, point your browser to the shell and when you get the shell, just pretend that you’re looking at the xterm interface. The best of all, it is open source!
Download the pwnshell here.
This is most useful at times when we when have an arbitrary file upload to a web-accessible directory that runs on J2EE. It could allow you to browse around the system with the privileges of the web application system user and execute arbitrary system commands. It can also show and alter session variables and help you dump JNDI entries.
pwnshell is a cross platform shell that runs on any system that supports Java 1.5 upwards. It’s usage is also simple – upload it to a vulnerable web directory, point your browser to the shell and when you get the shell, just pretend that you’re looking at the xterm interface. The best of all, it is open source!
Download the pwnshell here.
PandaLabs Annual Report 2010
In 2010, cyber-criminals have created and distributed a third of all existing viruses. That is, in just 12 months, they have created 34 percent of all malware that has ever existed and has been classified by the company. Furthermore, the Collective Intelligence system, which automatically detects, analyzes and classifies 99.4 percent of all malware received, currently stores 134 million unique files, out of which 60 million are malware (viruses, worms, Trojans and other computer threats).
Topics covered:
Trojans still dominate the ranking of new malware that has appeared in 2010 (56 percent of all samples), followed by viruses and worms. It is interesting to note that 11.6 percent of all the malware gathered in the Collective Intelligence database is rogueware or fake antivirus software, a malware category that despite appearing only four years ago is creating much havoc among users.
Click here to read full report
Topics covered:
* Threats in 2010
* Stuxnet, Iran and nuclear plants
* Cyber war
* Aurora
* Cyber-crime
* Cyber-protests
* Mariposa
* Social networks
* Rogueware
* 2010 in figures
* More BlackHat SEO
* Windows 7 vs Mac OS X Snow Leopard
* Cell phone security
* Spam in 2010
* Vulnerabilities in 2010
* Trends in 2011
* Conclusion
Trojans still dominate the ranking of new malware that has appeared in 2010 (56 percent of all samples), followed by viruses and worms. It is interesting to note that 11.6 percent of all the malware gathered in the Collective Intelligence database is rogueware or fake antivirus software, a malware category that despite appearing only four years ago is creating much havoc among users.
Click here to read full report
PandaLabs Annual Report 2010
In 2010, cyber-criminals have created and distributed a third of all existing viruses. That is, in just 12 months, they have created 34 percent of all malware that has ever existed and has been classified by the company. Furthermore, the Collective Intelligence system, which automatically detects, analyzes and classifies 99.4 percent of all malware received, currently stores 134 million unique files, out of which 60 million are malware (viruses, worms, Trojans and other computer threats).
Topics covered:
* Threats in 2010
* Stuxnet, Iran and nuclear plants
* Cyber war
* Aurora
* Cyber-crime
* Cyber-protests
* Mariposa
* Social networks
* Rogueware
* 2010 in figures
* More BlackHat SEO
* Windows 7 vs Mac OS X Snow Leopard
* Cell phone security
* Spam in 2010
* Vulnerabilities in 2010
* Trends in 2011
* Conclusion
Trojans still dominate the ranking of new malware that has appeared in 2010 (56 percent of all samples), followed by viruses and worms. It is interesting to note that 11.6 percent of all the malware gathered in the Collective Intelligence database is rogueware or fake antivirus software, a malware category that despite appearing only four years ago is creating much havoc among users.
Click here to read full report
Topics covered:
* Threats in 2010
* Stuxnet, Iran and nuclear plants
* Cyber war
* Aurora
* Cyber-crime
* Cyber-protests
* Mariposa
* Social networks
* Rogueware
* 2010 in figures
* More BlackHat SEO
* Windows 7 vs Mac OS X Snow Leopard
* Cell phone security
* Spam in 2010
* Vulnerabilities in 2010
* Trends in 2011
* Conclusion
Trojans still dominate the ranking of new malware that has appeared in 2010 (56 percent of all samples), followed by viruses and worms. It is interesting to note that 11.6 percent of all the malware gathered in the Collective Intelligence database is rogueware or fake antivirus software, a malware category that despite appearing only four years ago is creating much havoc among users.
Click here to read full report
Monday, January 3, 2011
Registry/Registrar Separation Coming to an End?
Since 1998, there has been a separation between domain registries that manage and operate Top Level Domains (TLD ) and the registrars that sell domain names. That policy of separation will not be carried forward for a new generation of TLDs ,set to emerge over the course of the next several years.
A number of domain name industry stakeholders — including the .org registry and TLD operator Afilias – opposed the move to remove the separation of registries from registrars. They argued that having cross-ownership could lead to abuses and lack of competition. With a new ICANN policy set to enable cross-ownership, consumer protections will be put in place which may help alleviate those concerns.
“After much debate on the issue of vertical integration, this month the ICANN board voted to allow registrars own new TLD registries,” Roland LaPlante, senior vice-president and chief marketing officer at Afilias told InternetNews.com. “To be clear, Afilias raised concerns about whether adequate consumer protection could be assured in vertically integrated registries/registrars. ICANN has adopted specific mechanisms designed to guard against abusive practices that could harm domain name registrants.”
With the new ICANN policy, there is now an opportunity for Afilias to profit from the new rules. LaPlante noted that many registrars have already approached Afilias as a potential back-end service for TLDs they plan to apply for.
On the issue of trying to prevent potential abuse of the registry/registrar cross-ownership, LaPlante said that governance of registrar/registry ownership is an ICANN issue. That said, he added that Afilias has a positive track record of ensuring that all registrars have equal access to its registry system. According to LaPlante, it is Afilias’ intention to continue to be vigilant in that area.
While ICANN has opened the door to cross-ownership, potential domain registry operators will need to overcome a number of technical challenges. That’s where Afilias is looking to profit, with services for potential new TLD registry/registrar owners.
“Afilias is offering a white-labeled registry service to registrars that seek to launch new TLDs in this upcoming round,” LaPlante said. “We also offer this service, as we do for 15 other TLDs, to corporations or communities looking to launch their new TLD bids.”
As part of the new round of TLDs from ICANN, Afilias has previously announced that it is part of a bid for the .eco TLD. With cross-ownership now possible, the ownership landscape of the overall domain name industry could be shifting as well.
“There are a variety of models that may come about from this new TLD round for Afilias or other registry providers – whether as simply service providers, joint ventures, or applying for new TLDs directly,” LaPlante said. “We will be making some exciting announcements as the new TLD application timeframe is finalized.”
ICANN is now in the public comment phase for the final Applicant Guidebook for new generic TLDs. The public comment period ends on December 10th, after which ICANN plans on spending four months on market outreach about the new TLDs application process.
A number of domain name industry stakeholders — including the .org registry and TLD operator Afilias – opposed the move to remove the separation of registries from registrars. They argued that having cross-ownership could lead to abuses and lack of competition. With a new ICANN policy set to enable cross-ownership, consumer protections will be put in place which may help alleviate those concerns.
“After much debate on the issue of vertical integration, this month the ICANN board voted to allow registrars own new TLD registries,” Roland LaPlante, senior vice-president and chief marketing officer at Afilias told InternetNews.com. “To be clear, Afilias raised concerns about whether adequate consumer protection could be assured in vertically integrated registries/registrars. ICANN has adopted specific mechanisms designed to guard against abusive practices that could harm domain name registrants.”
With the new ICANN policy, there is now an opportunity for Afilias to profit from the new rules. LaPlante noted that many registrars have already approached Afilias as a potential back-end service for TLDs they plan to apply for.
On the issue of trying to prevent potential abuse of the registry/registrar cross-ownership, LaPlante said that governance of registrar/registry ownership is an ICANN issue. That said, he added that Afilias has a positive track record of ensuring that all registrars have equal access to its registry system. According to LaPlante, it is Afilias’ intention to continue to be vigilant in that area.
While ICANN has opened the door to cross-ownership, potential domain registry operators will need to overcome a number of technical challenges. That’s where Afilias is looking to profit, with services for potential new TLD registry/registrar owners.
“Afilias is offering a white-labeled registry service to registrars that seek to launch new TLDs in this upcoming round,” LaPlante said. “We also offer this service, as we do for 15 other TLDs, to corporations or communities looking to launch their new TLD bids.”
As part of the new round of TLDs from ICANN, Afilias has previously announced that it is part of a bid for the .eco TLD. With cross-ownership now possible, the ownership landscape of the overall domain name industry could be shifting as well.
“There are a variety of models that may come about from this new TLD round for Afilias or other registry providers – whether as simply service providers, joint ventures, or applying for new TLDs directly,” LaPlante said. “We will be making some exciting announcements as the new TLD application timeframe is finalized.”
ICANN is now in the public comment phase for the final Applicant Guidebook for new generic TLDs. The public comment period ends on December 10th, after which ICANN plans on spending four months on market outreach about the new TLDs application process.
Registry/Registrar Separation Coming to an End?
Since 1998, there has been a separation between domain registries that manage and operate Top Level Domains (TLD ) and the registrars that sell domain names. That policy of separation will not be carried forward for a new generation of TLDs ,set to emerge over the course of the next several years.
A number of domain name industry stakeholders — including the .org registry and TLD operator Afilias – opposed the move to remove the separation of registries from registrars. They argued that having cross-ownership could lead to abuses and lack of competition. With a new ICANN policy set to enable cross-ownership, consumer protections will be put in place which may help alleviate those concerns.
“After much debate on the issue of vertical integration, this month the ICANN board voted to allow registrars own new TLD registries,” Roland LaPlante, senior vice-president and chief marketing officer at Afilias told InternetNews.com. “To be clear, Afilias raised concerns about whether adequate consumer protection could be assured in vertically integrated registries/registrars. ICANN has adopted specific mechanisms designed to guard against abusive practices that could harm domain name registrants.”
With the new ICANN policy, there is now an opportunity for Afilias to profit from the new rules. LaPlante noted that many registrars have already approached Afilias as a potential back-end service for TLDs they plan to apply for.
On the issue of trying to prevent potential abuse of the registry/registrar cross-ownership, LaPlante said that governance of registrar/registry ownership is an ICANN issue. That said, he added that Afilias has a positive track record of ensuring that all registrars have equal access to its registry system. According to LaPlante, it is Afilias’ intention to continue to be vigilant in that area.
While ICANN has opened the door to cross-ownership, potential domain registry operators will need to overcome a number of technical challenges. That’s where Afilias is looking to profit, with services for potential new TLD registry/registrar owners.
“Afilias is offering a white-labeled registry service to registrars that seek to launch new TLDs in this upcoming round,” LaPlante said. “We also offer this service, as we do for 15 other TLDs, to corporations or communities looking to launch their new TLD bids.”
As part of the new round of TLDs from ICANN, Afilias has previously announced that it is part of a bid for the .eco TLD. With cross-ownership now possible, the ownership landscape of the overall domain name industry could be shifting as well.
“There are a variety of models that may come about from this new TLD round for Afilias or other registry providers – whether as simply service providers, joint ventures, or applying for new TLDs directly,” LaPlante said. “We will be making some exciting announcements as the new TLD application timeframe is finalized.”
ICANN is now in the public comment phase for the final Applicant Guidebook for new generic TLDs. The public comment period ends on December 10th, after which ICANN plans on spending four months on market outreach about the new TLDs application process.
A number of domain name industry stakeholders — including the .org registry and TLD operator Afilias – opposed the move to remove the separation of registries from registrars. They argued that having cross-ownership could lead to abuses and lack of competition. With a new ICANN policy set to enable cross-ownership, consumer protections will be put in place which may help alleviate those concerns.
“After much debate on the issue of vertical integration, this month the ICANN board voted to allow registrars own new TLD registries,” Roland LaPlante, senior vice-president and chief marketing officer at Afilias told InternetNews.com. “To be clear, Afilias raised concerns about whether adequate consumer protection could be assured in vertically integrated registries/registrars. ICANN has adopted specific mechanisms designed to guard against abusive practices that could harm domain name registrants.”
With the new ICANN policy, there is now an opportunity for Afilias to profit from the new rules. LaPlante noted that many registrars have already approached Afilias as a potential back-end service for TLDs they plan to apply for.
On the issue of trying to prevent potential abuse of the registry/registrar cross-ownership, LaPlante said that governance of registrar/registry ownership is an ICANN issue. That said, he added that Afilias has a positive track record of ensuring that all registrars have equal access to its registry system. According to LaPlante, it is Afilias’ intention to continue to be vigilant in that area.
While ICANN has opened the door to cross-ownership, potential domain registry operators will need to overcome a number of technical challenges. That’s where Afilias is looking to profit, with services for potential new TLD registry/registrar owners.
“Afilias is offering a white-labeled registry service to registrars that seek to launch new TLDs in this upcoming round,” LaPlante said. “We also offer this service, as we do for 15 other TLDs, to corporations or communities looking to launch their new TLD bids.”
As part of the new round of TLDs from ICANN, Afilias has previously announced that it is part of a bid for the .eco TLD. With cross-ownership now possible, the ownership landscape of the overall domain name industry could be shifting as well.
“There are a variety of models that may come about from this new TLD round for Afilias or other registry providers – whether as simply service providers, joint ventures, or applying for new TLDs directly,” LaPlante said. “We will be making some exciting announcements as the new TLD application timeframe is finalized.”
ICANN is now in the public comment phase for the final Applicant Guidebook for new generic TLDs. The public comment period ends on December 10th, after which ICANN plans on spending four months on market outreach about the new TLDs application process.
Thursday, December 16, 2010
Hack Pack 33 hacking tools
Hack Pack 33 great hacking tools
INCLUDE IN THIS PACKAGE:
KEYLOGGERS & PASSWORD STEALING:
+ Ardamax 2.8
+ Ardamax 3.0
+ Fake Messenger w/ password retriever (Revenge Messenger)
+ Silent Keylogger by BUNNN
+ Digital Keylogger v3.3
+ Infinity YouTube cracker (doesn't work according to many but its still present)
CRYPTERS AND BINDERS:
+ File Joiner v2.01
+ File Injector v3
+ Xeus Technologies HotFusion binder
+ Japabrz's Csharp crypter
+ Daemon Crypt V2
+ Crypter v1.2
+ nBinder v5.5 premium
+ Easy Binder v2
+ Shell Labs Icon Changer
+ ShockLabs file binder
+ uBinder v1.30 SE (someone's private binder, it is almost FUD)
FREEZERS & BOMBERS:
+ Frozen Land MSN Freezer v1
+ Facebook Freezer
+ Hotmail Lockers
+ Email Bomber (an HTML page, no exe required!)
RATS:
+ Beast v2.07
+ BitFrost v1.2
+ Dark Moon v4.11
+ Lost Door v2.2 Stable public edition
+ MiniMo v0.7 public beta
+ Nuclear RAT v2.1.0
+ Optix v1.33
+ PaiN RAT 0.1 beta 9
+ Poison Ivy v2.3.2
+ Shark 3
+ Spy+Net v.1.7
+ Y3 RAT v2.5 RC 10
OTHERS:
+ Proxy Switch v3.9 Ultimate
+ Savk AV Killers (all 5 safe and deadly versions)
+ Ardamax keylogger remover
NOTE: All software is full and cracks/serials are included, there are no trials or demos. It would be best to run all these tools either Sandboxed, or from a Virtual Machine.
Great package with a lot of the best hack tools for everyone !

KEYLOGGERS & PASSWORD STEALING:
+ Ardamax 2.8
+ Ardamax 3.0
+ Fake Messenger w/ password retriever (Revenge Messenger)
+ Silent Keylogger by BUNNN
+ Digital Keylogger v3.3
+ Infinity YouTube cracker (doesn't work according to many but its still present)
CRYPTERS AND BINDERS:
+ File Joiner v2.01
+ File Injector v3
+ Xeus Technologies HotFusion binder
+ Japabrz's Csharp crypter
+ Daemon Crypt V2
+ Crypter v1.2
+ nBinder v5.5 premium
+ Easy Binder v2
+ Shell Labs Icon Changer
+ ShockLabs file binder
+ uBinder v1.30 SE (someone's private binder, it is almost FUD)
FREEZERS & BOMBERS:
+ Frozen Land MSN Freezer v1
+ Facebook Freezer
+ Hotmail Lockers
+ Email Bomber (an HTML page, no exe required!)
RATS:
+ Beast v2.07
+ BitFrost v1.2
+ Dark Moon v4.11
+ Lost Door v2.2 Stable public edition
+ MiniMo v0.7 public beta
+ Nuclear RAT v2.1.0
+ Optix v1.33
+ PaiN RAT 0.1 beta 9
+ Poison Ivy v2.3.2
+ Shark 3
+ Spy+Net v.1.7
+ Y3 RAT v2.5 RC 10
OTHERS:
+ Proxy Switch v3.9 Ultimate
+ Savk AV Killers (all 5 safe and deadly versions)
+ Ardamax keylogger remover
NOTE: All software is full and cracks/serials are included, there are no trials or demos. It would be best to run all these tools either Sandboxed, or from a Virtual Machine.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)